Picture
This week my wife and daughter were introduced to a new puppy while they were at my In-laws.  A friend of the family had just bought him and they wanted to show him off, so they brought him over. 

My wife said that the puppy loved Katelyn.  They didn’t know if it was just because Katelyn was smaller or what, but the puppy wouldn’t give anyone else much attention.  It would follow Katelyn around everywhere she went.  If Katelyn ran somewhere, it ran after her.  There were others around.  No doubt they were ready to lavish the dog with attention as we are big dog lovers.  But the dog wouldn’t be distracted.  It stuck with our daughter. 

There was something about my daughter with which the dog had become infatuated.  As a result, nothing (or nobody) else mattered.

That is but a small example of what happens to all God’s creatures, including us.  As creatures of habit we are prone to sectarianism.  After we join a certain circle and find acceptance there, we begin to ignore or neglect what is outside of that little sphere.  What is familiar and dearly beloved becomes our normal range of concern.  Even though there are lots of different people all around us, we don’t concern ourselves with them. 

And while this is not necessarily a bad thing, we must never allow such sectarianism appear within our church.  There is a danger that we can become exclusive.  Though nothing is written, we can make certain rules or set a certain culture.  As a result our church can become like an elite club.  The members of a church can become so introverted that they build a wall between themselves and rest of the world.

Our passage urges us to guard against sectarianism.  It urges us to reflect the cosmic scope of Christianity in three very practical ways.   It tells us to expand the range of our prayers, see the extent of our Lord’s salvation, broaden the reach of our ministry.

In order to reflect the cosmic Scope of Christianity, verses one and two tell us that…

I. We must expand the range of our prayers
This is what Paul urges us to do in verses 1, 2.  He says, "First of all, then, I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all people, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way."  

I would bet, if we were to examine each of our prayer lists, we would find them to be very exclusive.  I would assume that they would be limited to family members and those within the church. 

That we are praying for such items is a wonderful thing.  And that we are regularly interceding for our dear loved ones shows that we are following the biblical mandate to do so.  It is good that we call upon the Lord for our needs and offer our burdens to him in times of secret prayer.  But our prayers should not be limited to these areas. 

The Lord calls us to expand the range of our prayers.  He wants us to pray for all kinds of people.  That’s what he means in this verse.  He does not mean that we should pray for every person in the world.  That is impossible, and it would be an absurd thing to require of us. 

No, that he means we should pray for all kinds of people is evident from verse 2.  He clarifies what he means by specifying a certain kind of people, namely kings and those in high positions.    

Obviously here he indicates that we should be in prayer for our national and civil leaders.  And this is a matter of great importance.  Our leaders make decisions every day that affect our lives.  Their policies affect the freedoms we enjoy as citizens and especially as Christians.  Therefore, it is important that we intercede on their behalf, asking that they may be filled with wisdom and grace. 

Now we do not have to do this every time we bow our heads in supplication.  Maybe it will be once during the day, or perhaps you select a specific day of the week to pray for leaders.  You might set aside every Monday, or rather include them in your Sunday afternoon prayers.  The occasion doesn’t matter.  What is important is that we devote some time in prayer for those whom God has placed in authority over us. 

But keep in mind that we can be exclusive even here.  By that I mean that we can pray for leaders, but only the ones we like. 

It is a great thing to hear so many people lifting up our president in prayer.  Ever since he came to office the Christian community has been diligent to pray that he be protected and guided by God’s wisdom.  But I’m not so sure that the oval office has always been so privileged.  We have been earnest for President Bush, but did we demonstrate the same sort of diligence for former president, President Clinton? 

We were disgusted with his immorality.  We did not like his womanizing.  Some of us might not have liked his policies either.  But did these things make us pray for him, or keep us from it?

When God calls us to pray for all people, he means all kinds of people, even those we don’t like. 

If you think about it, those authority figures we are most frustrated with are the ones who need the most prayer.  Those who might not be as favorable to Christianity are the ones who are most liable to make our lives miserable.  And we are commanded to pray for them.  Why?  The passage says, “That we may live a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way.”

Our prayers are God’s instruments of peace.  They are the tuning forks that God uses to bring harmony where conflict exists. 

Christianity is an inclusive religion.  That is why we must expand the range of our prayers.  But since its scope is so wide, we must also see the extend of God’s salvation…

II. See the extent of our God’s salvation
This is good, and it is pleasing in the sight of God our Savior,  [4] who desires all people to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.  [5] For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus,  [6] who gave himself as a ransom for all, which is the testimony given at the proper time

If we are going to pray for all kinds of people, we need the right perspective.  And verses 3-6 give us the perspective we need.  These verses say that God desires to save all kinds of people.  Now note how I said that, “God wants to save all kinds of people.” 

Some people like to use this verse against Calvinism.  They think that this verse proves that the doctrine of predestination isn’t real.  Their argument goes like this:  “God wants to save all people, but, as we readily see, not everyone is saved.  So God doesn’t effect salvation, he just provides it.”  They argue then like this, “Jesus died for all, but anyone who is saved has to make himself believe.”  Just like a waiter with a plate of h’ordeurves.  Rather than God giving you the h’orderve, He provides the h’ordeurves.  And, in your own strength, you have to reach up and grab it. 

But such a belief doesn’t understand that we can’t reach up and grab God’s salvation.  It doesn’t understand that we are dead in our sins, and have no ability whatsoever to make ourselves saved. 

What we need to do is look at this verse in its context.  Remember that we just said of verse 1 that we are to pray for “all kinds of people.”  We noted that one kind of people we are to pray for are those of rank, our authorities.  The same idea is used here.  Jesus did not die for every individual, he died for all kinds of people.  God does not want every person that ever lived to be saved from hell, he desires to save some people, that is all kinds of people. 

Let me say it like this:  God, out of his mere good pleasure, decreed to save people of every race, rank, and region.  In heaven we will find that Jesus died and brought salvation to a great host of people.  This people will be as diverse as there are people on this earth.  Revelation 5:9 illustrates this.  It says of Jesus, “You were slain, and by your blood you ransomed people for God from every tribe and language and people and nation.”  In other words, there is going to be representatives from across the globe in heaven.

And this is exactly the point God wants us to see.  To keep from becoming sectarian we must see that God’s plan of salvation reaches beyond the little borders we erect.  If we are going to pray for all people we must understand that God’s salvation extends that far.

When I was at the Twin Lakes conference this past week the Lord helped me to realize this.  The camp cite we were on was immense.  There was a pool, multiple dorms and cabins, basketball courts, eating facilities, a lodge, high ropes courses, challenge courses.  I knew that the camp was big, but I was only familiar with the main lodge and my cabin.  And these two were right beside each other.  My view of the campus was quite limited.  It was only when I was taken on a tour of the camp that I came to realize how big the camp really was.  For about an hour 8 of us road through the woods on various trails to see the sights.  At points our guide would stop and point out and say over there is where we have horse riding.  I would look where he was pointing only to see a vast sea of grass stretching out before me.  At the end of our tour we had only viewed a small fractin of the 460 acres the church owned.  I was blown away at the how immense that place really was.

This is the type of view God wants us to have of his vast salvation.  He wants us to look beyond our little circle of familiarity and see that He is saving a vast multitude.  He wants us to marvel at his limitless mercy.  He wants us to view the extent of his salvation and see just a small glimpse of how gracious he really is. 

And He does that so that we will move out beyond our little neighborhood.  God does not want us to be a Christian ghetto.  God doesn’t look at the outside of a person like we do.  We look at someone and think, “Hey, that person is weird.  They dress weird, they act weird.”  And what we do we do, we put them on the untouchable list. 

But God shows us that he touches the untouchable.  God’s salvation is not dependent on one’s age, one’s dress, one’s economic status, or personal quirks.  God gives salvation to whoever he wants, and he chooses different people, even weird people, (he saved you didn’t he?). 

Because Christianity is cosmic, God wants you to expand the range of your prayers, He wants you to see the extent of his salvation.  Most of all, God wants you to broaden the sphere of your ministry.

III. Broaden the sphere of our ministry
 Look at verse 7.  It says, "For this I was appointed a preacher and an apostle ( I am telling the truth, I am not lying), a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and truth." 

Paul didn’t choose to be an apostle.  He didn’t even want to be an apostle.  As a matter of fact he wanted to kill the apostles.  But one day as he was going off to Damascus, Jesus appeared to him.  He said, “Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me?”  Paul responded, “Who are you lord?”  “Jesus said, I am Jesus who you are persecuting.”  Jesus then went on to say that He was drafting Paul into His service and making Paul the head of foreign relations.  Jesus made Paul His Ambassador to the Gentiles. (See Acts 9:13-17, 22:17-21, 26:12-18 for a further description)

Now think about who Paul was.  He was a Jew, and a really good one at that.  In Philipians 2 he calls himself a Hebrew of Hebrews.  He was trained in the best Jewish seminary.  He grew up in Jerusalem, which is like the Paris of Jewish culture.  Now you have to wonder if God really knew what he was doing.  I can just see Paul saying, “You’re sending me to who?  Ah, Jesus, I don’t think you understand the ethnic and geographical demographics going on here.  You see, we Jews don’t associate with Gentiles.  We don’t have that much in common, and we really don’t like each other that much.” 

But God knew exactly what He was doing when he appointed Paul to this position.  God was saying to Paul, “Hey, Paul.  This Christianity thing, it’s not just for Jews.  I created all types of people, and I want to save all kinds of people.  And to get you used to what it is going to be like in heaven, I’m going to send you to people you’re not used to.”  

 The gospel is cross-cultural.  The problem is: we aren’t.  God created an array of people, as diverse as the colors on a rainbow.  But we tend to keep the gospel in our little ghetto. 

One of my friends in seminary made a very good point a few years back.  He said, our problem is we think that the gospel is only for upper middle class suburban white males.  In other words, we think the gospel is only for us.

But there are no Jim Crow laws attached to the gospel.  It’s not for whites only.  It’s for black people and for Asian people; for children and for the elderly; it’s for the inner city as well as for Billy Joe-Bob in the hills of West Virginia. 

Our ministry must reflect that.  We can’t be playing duck-duck-goose with the gospel.  You know how that game is played don’t you.  You go around the circle patting each kid on the head saying duck-duck-duck.  And while your going around the circle your thinking about who are you going to goose.  You only get one chance to be the goose-er and you don’t want to waste it on just anybody.  So you try to pick just the right person.

And that’s how we can be with the gospel.  We can go around, “No not you, no, no, no, not you.”   And we disguise it with nice little rationalizations like “You’re too sinful.” Or “You wouldn’t fit in at our church.”  Or maybe we say, “Someone with that many tattoos just wouldn’t get what the gospel is all about.” So rather than giving the gospel out indiscriminately, or administering compassion to someone in need, we withhold it until just the right person comes along.”

But God calls us to broaden the sphere of our ministry.   He calls us to reach out to the different kinds of people he sets all around us.  He could be a punk rocker or she might be someone we try to avoid.  But if they are in our lives, God calls us to be ready to minister to them, no matter how different they are.  Christianity is cosmic, and our ministry must reflect it.

Conclusion:
If you have ever gone to Disney World in Orlando Florida you’ve been able to sample a bit of the world.  There a section of Disney World that exposes you to all the different foods from a lot of different places.  And as you sample those different cultures you get the idea that the world is a lot more wide-ranging than you’re used to.  And if you think about it, it’s not a small world after all!  It’s vast and diverse.

That’s the sort of religion Christianity is.  God created a big world and he filled it with all kinds of people.  And as the people of God, we should reflect that in our lives.  God calls us to see that his salvation extends across this globe and reaches an array of people.  With this view of the breadth of God’s salvation we should be ready to expand the range of our prayers, praying for people beyond our normal circles.  And knowing that God is bringing a vast multitude to himself, we should be ready to minister to all sorts of people, even people who are radically different than us.


 
 
1 Timothy 3:1-7                                                                                  
  
(Listen to Audio)
Last time we were together we studied a subject with which many people find hard, the subject of women in office.  A number of you even commented to me after the message that this is a hard teaching in our day. 


Someone who might disagree with the Bible’s stance might then retort, “Well, I guess God is a chauvinist then, isn’t he?”  That might be how a person might respond.  But God continues in chapter three to talk about the office of overseer.  And he does so in order that everyone might see that even among men, not every one qualifies for this special office. 

God doesn’t want just anyone taking charge over his people.  He has high standards.  But at the same time, God doesn’t send an angel from heaven to tell us who he wants governing us.  He commits us with the solemn responsibility of choosing our leaders. 

That ought to make us consider carefully who we would have ruling over us.  Worthy candidates for the office of overseer meet God’s criteria.  In this passage we find God’s criteria for overseers. 

So what are the criteria?  What should we be looking for in a church leader?  Our passage tells us that a candidate for the office of overseer must possess a personal ambition for it, understand the nature of it, and meet the qualifications for it.  So a candidate desires it, understands it, and qualifies for it.  

First of all we see that candidates for this office must possess a personal ambition for this office.

I. Possess a personal ambition
Verse 1 says, “If anyone aspires to the office of overseer, he desires a noble task.”

Those would be leaders should be people who desire the office they are going to fill. 

There have been some who have said otherwise.  They think that desiring to be an officer in the church is an act of pomp.  They say that one is called to the office, and that people should not seek the office. 

As with all error, there is a hint of truth to this: one must be called to the office.  But that does not mean one should surpress any desires he has for it.

People can err on the opposite extreme too.  Perhaps you’ve seen people become elders in a church against their will.  They don’t really want to be a part of the session, but the congregation pressures them into it.  They finally say, “OK, I guess I’ll do it.”

In theology we affirm that there is an internal call for the ministry.  The external call is the call that the church gives to the one coming to office.  The church is God’s instrument in electing and ordaining church leaders.  The one God wants to minister in the church will be approved by His people.  As a congregation we witness one’s giftedness and character.  And then together we testify that they should be a leader.  The external call, the call by the congregation, is essential for ordination.  One cannot subvert the church’s will and become a dictator in it.

But we also affirm the legitimacy of the inward call.  The inward call is the personal desire that one has for the ministry.  If someone is to undertake the duties of overseers, then the Lord will place in his heart the internal motivation to do so.

In their book “On Being a Pastor” Alister Beg and Derek Prime relate a story about an Englishman named Alan Stibbs.  When in school Stibbs was part of a well attended group called the Scripture Union.  While it was a well attended group, there was no one who would undertake the leadership of the group.  So for two years, between the ages of 16 and 18, Stibbs carried the responsibility alone.  Three times a week he had to stand before his school contemporaries and expound the scriptures to them.

In his own words Stibbs wrote, "I began as a schoolboy of 17 to pray for the gift of prophesying.  On each occasion when I expounded the word I prayed for the grace worthily to exercise the gift to the glory of God and blessing of men.” 

Here is a young man who demonstrates a healthy desire for the ministry.  His circumstances might be a little different, being he was virtually thrust into the ministry.  But his desires were nonetheless real.

But let’s remember those desires must be set upon the appropriate thing.  It’s possible that someone would desire the office of overseer, but his desires are misguided because his understanding of the office is wrong.  He might desire the position because it is a place of high status and respect.  Of course, if that is the case, his desires are no different from that of the Pharisees Jesus rebuked.  You remember Jesus said of the Pharisees they loved being greeted in the marketplace and the seats of prominence at feasts and social gatherings.  That’s why candidates for the office of overseer must understand the nature of the office.

II. understand the nature of the office
In this passage Paul uses the Greek word episkopos.  We translate it into English as either “bishop” or “overseer.”

When we think of bishops we might think of Roman Catholicism or the Episcopal church where they have high ranking officials called bishops.  But in the early church they did not have such a hierarchy.  A bishop was, for the most part, synonymous with elder.  It just emphasizes a different aspect of the ministry.

The word elder has to do with ruling and governing the people of God.  Elder, then, has to do with authority.  But episkopos deals with responsibility.  Paul uses the word bishop (or overseer) he wants to emphasize that the church leader is charged with the task of oversight of God’s people.  In other words, the spiritual well-being of those in the church is his responsibility.

In using the word overseer, we find that the church leader is much like a nurse.  When you are in the hospital a nurse comes to check on you regularly.  He or she checks your vitals on a regular basis and tend to your needs in order that you may become healthy again.

That is what an overseer does.  An elder in the church must tend to all his parishioners like patients.  He checks their spiritual vitals signs by regular visitations to their home.  He tends to their needs as he comes before the Lord in prayer.  He does many things in order that they might maintain a healthy spiritual life.

But not only does Paul emphasize the responsibility of a church leader, he also emphasizes the strain.

He does not say “the one who desires the office of an overseer desires a good office.”  He says “he desires a good work.”  Calvin makes much of this point in his commentary on this passage.  He goes to great lengths to communicate the fact that the one who holds this office will face a great ordeal.  Leadership in the church is a difficult task.  It can be a strain upon one’s person because it requires a great amount of time and energy.

There are meetings to go attend.  There are visitations that will take you away from your home and family.  It is required that you spend time in prayer for each of those put under your care, their children, and for their personal problems and joys. 

I was once talking with a fellow at work whose son is a wrestler at Ashland High School.  He had some pictures at his work station, and I was looking at them.  He pointed out which one was his son.  And like a proud father he said that his son qualified for state competition this past year.  He also mentioned that his son was a senior.  I then asked if he was going to go on and play in college.  He responded that he wasn’t sure that he was.  College wrestling is a lot different than High School.  It takes up a lot of one’s time.  You have to really invest yourself as an athlete if you are going to play on that level. 

While his son loved the sport, and desired to participate in it, there is the possibility that the work load (the mere time investment) would keep him away from it.

The same holds true for those who would be ministers in the church.  If you desire the office of overseer, then you must also desire the work that comes with it.  If you don’t much care for people, then that might be a good indicator that you are not made out for such a work.  If you don’t like being bothered much with people’s problems, then most likely, church work is not for you.

But, on the other hand, if these things in some way attract you, then you might be God’s man for the job.  

A candidate for the gospel ministry then, must possess ambition for the ministry and knowledge of the ministry.  But we must not think that these alone make one eligible for the office.  Even among those who desire the office and its rigors, there are some who still do not qualify.  Candidates must must also meet the right criteria. 

III. meet the spiritual qualifications
In all there are 15 qualifications that one must meet in order to be a candidate for the office.  Now if we spent time examining each one we would be here all night.  As a matter of fact, when I was in seminary, the president of the school would give a sermon on one of the qualifications each time he was to speak.  Certainly I am not going to do that! 

If you like homework for personal study, you can meditate on these qualifications more than we will here.  You could do what William Hendrickson did and match each attribute with someone in the Bible. 

For the sake of time I will abbreviate and condense.  If we look at verses 2&3 we find that the overseer must be…

A. an overall moral man [2-3]
I think it is summed up in the very first virtue spoken of in the list.  He must be “above reproach.”

As a leader an elder must set an example for the people of God.  If the leadership lacks good moral character, then where will the congregation stand in comparison?  Paul says in 1 Cor. 11:1, “Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ.”  He set himself as a standard for the people.  They were to follow his example of godliness. 

An elder must possess that same quality.  This is not to say that they are perfect, of course.  But this person does express an exceptional level of morality.  One that people cannot easily criticize. 

Let me just touch on a few others in this list.  It says that the elder should be the “husband of one wife.”  When we read that we think that it excludes people who were divorced or who had a wife who died and then the man remarried.  But that is imputing our day upon the text.  You must remember that back then it was common to have multiple wives.  Polygamy was a norm in that day.  He is saying that an elder must have one wife at a time.  So let’s not assume that divorce automatically excludes one from the office of overseer.

He also says that an elder must be “hospitable.”  Some virtues are emphasized more than others, and I would say that this one is considered a throw away.  But God’s word says that an elder must be one who is ready to bring others into his home.  He must be one who is filled with compassion.  So much so that he is willing to do sacrificial acts of charity.  We read in Romans 12 that all Christians are commanded to be hospitable, but, as with all duties incumbent upon Christians, an elder must demonstrate it in a greater degree.  We cannot disregard hospitality because it is part of one’s general morality.

We will let the other qualities in those two verses be for your personal study.  We have seen enough to say that the elder should be an overall moral man.  If we look at the next two verses we can summarize them by saying the elder must be…

B. a good patriarch [4-5]
These verses have to do with his home.  Let’s read them together.  “He must manage his own household well, with all dignity keeping his children submissive,  [5] for if someone does not know how to manage his own household, how will he care for God's church?”  

Some have asserted that the elder must be a married man.  They would point to these verses as well as the phrase “the husband of but one wife.”  But marriage is not a requisite for an elder.  Single or widowed men may certainly qualify.

These verses only pertain to those who have families.  And what it means is that the home is the testing ground for the ministry.  Within the walls of you home you have a little congregation.  God has entrusted us fathers and husbands with the care of his people.  And if we cannot rule them well, then how is it that we can think we would do well with other people and other people’s families?

Now note that it does not say that the children are all saints.  It says that his management of them is exceptional.  Dr. Donald McNair, a long time professor at Covenant Seminary, almost quite the ministry because he had a child who was quite rebellious.  In his teenage years he caused a great amount of problems within the community.  Because he thought his son’s rebellion disqualified him for the ministry, Dr. McNair came to his Session and submitted his resignation. 

The session in turn refused his resignation, saying that he did manage his house well.  Dr. McNair did everything he could to help his child lead an orderly life.  It was just that the son was obstinate, and would not heed his father’s words.

The Bible’s instruction is that the overseer must manage his house well, it does not mean that he will have a perfect house.

ØVerse 6 gives us another characteristic.  The elder must be…

C. a mature Christian [6]
He must not be a recent convert, or he may become puffed up with conceit and fall into the condemnation of the devil.”

In the original language this is put quite poeticly.  It literally says, “He must not be newly planted.”  The idea is of one who has had enough time to grow roots in the faith, so he is fragile. 

When Elizabeth and I lived in Indiana one of my yearly tasks was an attempt at getting grass to grow.  The first year’s crop was so pitiful.  But no matter the bounty of grass, there were a few that crept up.  And that is the most critical time for the grass.  They can’t take any pressure, and you must wait until the grass matures in order to cut it.

That’s how it must be with our leaders.  We must not adgitate them by putting them in a position where they might be damaged.  And that’s exactly what Paul points out.  The new convert becomes conceited and falls under judgement.

You might remember a while back that Deon Sanders made an evangelical profession of faith.  What immediately happened?  People put him in a place of prominence, and made him go around preaching.  Rather than helping the kingdom, they were exposing this young one in the faith to much harm.

And if you think about it, why would you want a new convert leading a congregation.  Most people don’t go to doctors who haven’t even had any experience. 

But sometimes people don’t think about these things when they elect their officers.  They see someone who is a successful businessman and they think, “let’s make him a leader,” despite his immaturity.

If you look though, our list is not a list of skills.  The only real skill mentioned is his being apt to teach.  We scrutinize one’s character.

And so far we have seen that that elder must be a moral man, a good patriarch, a mature Christian, and finally, he must be…

D. a reputable person [7]
Verse 7 says, “Moreover, he must be well thought of by outsiders, so that he may not fall into disgrace, into a snare of the devil.”

Funny how one of a leader’s references for church office must be from the unbelievers.  

Conclusion:
If you were to ask any High School coach what he would rather have, an all star athlete without any discipline or an average player with excellent discipline, most often they would take the average player.  That’s because they know that they can do more with that average player.  The average player will be a team player and team leader because he is disciplined.

And that’s exactly the same with who God wants to hold office in his church.  He does not necessarily want someone who is famous or popular, he wants men who are disciplined and godly.

As you can see from tonight’s study, God does not open the doors for anyone to fill the office of overseer.  He is quite choosy.  And as we choose our leaders we must be just as selective.   Candidates for church office must posses the desire, know their duty, and meet his standards.
 
 
1 Timothy 2:8-14

A number of years ago I began re-reading a book on the history of my denomination, the Presbyterian Church of America.  It is a book that tracks how our denomination came to be formed.  In that book it records some of the outrageous things that were going on in the PCUS, the denomination the PCA split from in 1973.


As I read that book I was shocked to find some of what was happening in worship services of all things.  One story recounted how the minister opened by saying “Let us Worship God.” And then proceeded to lead the congregation in singing Simon and Garfunkel’s hit song, “Mrs. Robinson.”  Other innovations included Communion services conducted with masks, sermons given by way of interpretive dance, and fast flashing videos that mocked the government’s involvement in Vietnam.

Even in Evangelical churches today we can see people experimenting with alternate forms of worship.  People are breaking out of the “traditional” services to contemporize them or make them more attractive to the unbelieving.  

But we very seldom hear it asked, “What in worship pleases God?”  It’s ironic, that which we do in worship is supposed to be for God, but it is never composed with him in mind. 

It’s almost as if we were to want our child to have the best birthday celebration he has ever had, but as we plan the event we do so with only the things we like.  We have our favorite cake, our favorite games, our favorite music.  But when it comes time for the birthday, we are the only ones enjoying it.  The birthday boy sits on the step outside the house because he hates the music, the games, and even the cake.

Our chief and highest aim is to glorify God and enjoy him forever.  Our worship must reflect this.  So our worship must implement the things that God finds pleasing.  That’s why our worship must be governed by God’s Word.  In the scriptures we find the principles for God honoring worship. 

Of course we can’t usually open up to a certain page and find what God wants us to do in worship.  It usually takes some searching of the Scriptures.  But if you are going to search the scriptures, one place to begin is the pastoral epistles, the letters Paul wrote to Timothy.  Tonight we come to just one such teaching having to do with worship.  Here Paul gives directives on how to conduct God honoring, public worship.  As a matter of fact we find three directives for worship.  He tells us we must possess the appropriate attitudes, wear the appropriate attire, and fulfill the appropriate roles.

The first thing we find is that God honoring worship requires that we… 

I. Possess the appropriate attitudes
Verse 8 points out two attitudes we should possess when we come to worship, one with respect to God and one with respect to man.  The attitude that we should have towards God is represented in the posture of lifting up holy hands in prayer. 

In Judaism, people would raise their hands for a variety of reasons, some of which are still replicated.  The priests would bless the people with their hands uplifted, just like ministers today.  As well, raised hands was the posture of praise.  And may I say, the carismatics and non-denominational churches do not have the corner on raising your hands in praise.  Presbyterians can do that too.  Of course it is a little harder to do it with hymnals, and perhaps that is a good argument for memorizing the hymns or have them projected on a screen.  But let me just say in passing that we should not be ashamed to express the praise of our hearts in with this type of physical gesture.  It is a very Biblical, and natural thing.

But there was a third reason people raised their hands in Judaism.  And this one is not so much replicated today.  In Judaism people would raise their hands to bless and to praise, but they would also do when they would pray.  When they would come to God to make requests they would extend their hands heavenward with their palms facing up.  It was a sign of their right standing with God and of their dependence. 

We seem to be stuck in a rut today.  We only have one posture that we use in prayer, and that is one of contrition.  Whenever we pray we bow our heads and close our eyes.  But this is the posture of repentance and sorrow.  It says that we are not worthy to come to God.

In Judaism they recognized that the blood of atonement made them right with God.  They knew they could come to God confidently when they sought him in supplication.  But they did not come rashly, they knew they were dependent upon him.  So they lifted up their hands to symbolically acknowledge that whatever they would ask for, and whatever they would receive would finally and ultimately come from Him. 

This is how God wants us to come to worship.  Whether or not we express it physically (the form does not really matter), God wants us to come into worship acknowledging our dependence upon Him.  Our attitude in worship should be that of a weak and feeble child who must look to one who is greater to provide anything and everything they need for life.

And may I add, you cannot worship unless you have this spirit.  Worship by its very nature is an expression of dependence.  Our greatest pitfall in worship is not arriving late, its arriving unprepared.  We can come to worship and go through the motions, yet never offer up a single ounce of true worship.  That’s because we view ourselves as self-sufficient.  We got up on our own, got dressed on our own, and drove ourselves to the church.  But were it not for our God we would never have had the clothes we are wearing, or the gas in our cars.  And neither would we have even gotten up.  He could have made us pass away in the night.  Every point in our life relies upon God.  Even every breath we take is a token of His benevolence.  And we must come to worship acknowledging that very fact.

ØBut not only should we have an attitude of dependence, we should come with an attitude of peace.

That’s the attitude we should express toward man.  Verse 8 says that our prayers should be offered without anger or disputing. 

Your version might say doubting and that is a valid translation.  In older English the word doubting meant the same as disputing.  The idea is that of creating tension with another person through arguing.  In other words, we should refrain from any contention in the worship service.  We should have a spirit of peace so that we might direct our full and unbroken attention upon God.

Think about how easily we loose our focus on God.  We have our employments and recreations.  We have our sins and our miseries.  We have to fight hard enough to keep our attention from being drawn away from God to thinking about the sunshine coming in the windows.  Do we need any other distractions?  And will not contention between brothers be even more problematic.  Not only will it draw us away from worshipping God, but it will frustrate the harmony of the church.  It quickly becomes contagious.  I’m sure you know of churches that look like congress.  People will not cross the isle because of issues that they have been arguing about.

God desires us to reconcile whatever differences we may have before we come to worship.  He wants us to focus all of our attention on him and worship Him.  That’s why we must come to church with the appropriate attitudes:  the attitude of dependence and the attitude of peace.

ØBut God honoring worship does not stop there.  God is not only concerned that we possess the right attitudes, he is also concerned that we ...

II. Wear the appropriate clothes
The Lord says in verse 9, “Women should adorn themselves in respectable apparel, with modesty and self control, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly attire, but with what is proper for women who profess godliness.” 

Now Paul is not in any way setting a strict dress code.  He is addressing the fact that people’s attire had become the central focus rather than God.  In the Roman world people were infatuated with extravagance.  So when people gathered for church, it could look more like a fashion show than a worship service.  The women would arrive at church having adorned themselves ornately in order to make a display.

And that can be the same today.  We can be more concerned with what other people think about us rather than concerned for the worship of God.  A church can be a place where people dress to impress.  In vanity we can push to show off how rich we are.  Or it could be that a woman wants to accentuate her body in order to get the attention of a man or even make another woman jealous.  Either way, dress can have the potential to become a distraction in the church. 

Let me point out that Paul has nothing against jewelry, braided hair, or any other adornments as such.  Those of you who are ladies may feel free to dress up or take that extra time to put your hair in braids.  We should not err on the opposite extreme either.  Ugliness can be just as distracting!  Paul is merely concerned that we not rob God of the glory he is due.  Simply put, his point is this:  The way we dress or the way we comb our hair should not get in the way of the worship of God.

I was once speaking with a fellow from Canada about how different America is from his homeland.  He said that we Americans have that “Cowboy mentality.”  Where he comes from community and family are very important.  But in America we tend to be very individualistic.  He went on to talk about how it comes to expression in what we wear.  He said that when he first walked into American churches he was simply stunned at how the women dressed.  Some of the things that they wore were so sensual that he had a hard time focusing on the worship service.

We must make sure that what we put on our bodies, albeit on Sunday or any other day of the week, is tempered for the glory of God. 

And, to speak to you younger ladies among us, I recognize that this is becoming a very hard thing to do.  Most fashion designers don’t embrace our value system.  And a lot of times what is sold in the marketplace, while it might be fashionable, it might not honorable. 

So we must take care in choosing our clothes.  A Christian reveals what he or she believes in the choice of their clothing.  And that is just what John Calvin says on this verse, “Without doubt the dress of an honorable and godly woman ought to be different from that of a harlot.” 

In speaking of such an issue, I’m glad that I don’t have to worry about pressing it among you.  From what I have witnessed all of you demonstrate good judgment in your choice of apparel.  As a pastor I am most pleased that the ladies in our congregation have a sense of propriety and modesty, and I don’t have to worry about people being distracted in worship.  I commend you for this, and want to tell you that your discretion only enhances what we do here each week. 

If you have that guideline in mind, you will be doing the “good works” spoken of in verse 10.  For what better work can you do than allow for the best possible worship of God?  

The worship of God requires that we possess the right attitudes and wear the appropriate clothes.  But it also requires that we…

III. Fulfill the appropriate roles
After addressing what women should wear in church, Paul goes on in verses 11 and following to talk about how they must conduct themselves. 

He first says that “a woman should learn in quietness and full submission.”  When we read these words we must keep in mind that Paul does not forbid all vocal participation.  1 Corinthians 11 Paul talks about wives praying in the service.  One commentator says that Paul is requiring a silence of a particular sort.  A woman’s silence is one that respects the teaching of the Word and submits to the church’s leadership.

If I might rephrase it, a woman must fulfill the role of a disciple.  She is to be a listener and learner.  And Paul makes this more explicit in verse 12.  Paul says, “I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet.” 

Now to our modern ears this might sound quite offensive.  We are not used to people saying that there are things that are off limits to women.  In our day people say, “If a man can do it, so can a woman.” 

Now I want to affirm that women are of equal status to men.  God made man male and female.  Both were created in his image, and therefore both are thus precious in his eyes, and enjoy equal status.  God even created Eve from the side of Adam, showing that she is in no way a downgrade. 

While God gave them equal status, he gave them different roles.  And because there are different roles, there are limitations for both men and women.

One of those limitations is described here.  God has ordained that men fulfill the role of minister and elder.  That is what is spoken of here when it says that women may not teach or have authority over a man.

Let’s not confuse this by saying a woman may not teach at all.  Paul is only speaking of the office of elder and the teaching within the context of corporate worship.  And women are allowed to teach in certain contexts.  One of the primary duties of a mother is that of instructing her children.  And Paul makes it clear elsewhere that women are to be teaching other women.  And, in some cases, they can even teach men.  If you know of Priscilla and Aquilla, they were a husband and wife tag team.  In Acts 18 it says that they discipled a man by the name of Appolos.  That was a wonderful example of when it is appropriate for women to teach.

While we recognize that women can be involved to some degree in the ministry of the gospel, we recognize that it is limited.  God here shows us that women are restricted from the office of teaching and ruling.  Women are not allowed to fulfill the authoritative role of elder and minister within the church.

Having put forth that rule, let me address some objections that are commonly made against this doctrine.  A lot of people object by saying, “That’s just a cultural thing.”  You may say “Women back then did not enjoy the same status as they do today.  So that doesn’t apply anymore. In our day women are more respected and have a greater role in society.” 

But this command cannot be loosed by arguing that it was a culturally bound.   Paul shows us explicitly that it is not simply a cultural thing.  The basis for this restriction is found in the order of creation and the fall.  Read with me verses 13-14, “For Adam was formed first, then Eve; and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor.”  Paul’s argument is based on God’s design and the woman’s having been deceived.  God originally created man first.  As such, he was designed to be the leader.  God’s intent was that man was to be the decision maker and caretaker.

So we cannot simply say that this was “a cultural thing” which is no longer binding.  It is rooted in the creation, and as such it is rooted in the very structure of our nature.

Another objection that comes up typically is, “Well, you just have a very low view of women!”  To which I respond, Absolutely not!  That’s not the case at all.  When you understand what the bible says about women, you know this is not the case at all.  Women are to be cherished and honored in a very special way.  And if you would get to know me, you will see that simply is not true.  I do not have a low view of women.  It is my belief that women are to be treated like crystal glasswear.  Now you know you don’t just toss around crystal glasses.  You give them a respect and admiration that is incomparable with other everyday dishware.  You handle them with a particular gentleness and treat them with far greater dignity than your old plastic cups.

That’s how I view women.  And that’s how the Bible says we are to respect and honor them.  To say that we degrade women and have a low view of them is simply wrongheaded.

Again, women just have a different role to play.  And Paul points this out in verse 15.  He says, “Women will be saved through childbearing if they continue in faith, love, and holiness with propriety.”

Now this does not mean that women who have children are going to heaven.  That would counter the Biblical doctrine that Salvation comes through faith.  The church has traditionally interpreted this verse to mean that women find fulfillment when she understands her role as wife and mother.

One final objection to this teaching might be, “What’s the big deal?  Does it really matter that much.”  And I respond by saying, “Yes it is.”  As a matter of fact, many other churches have split over this issue.  And that includes my own denomination.  It is important for this reason:  If you forfeit this teaching, you forfeit the authority of the Bible. 

The question at hand is:  Hath God said.  And if you compromise here, you compromise the whole of Scripture.  I might add this:  If you relax on this issue you really open the door to all sorts of things, particularly that of ordaining homosexuals as we have come to see in so many mainline churches. 

God’s word must have the final say.  He is the one who created us and his Word should be the guiding principle in our lives.  Only when we fulfill the roles that he wants us to fulfill will life be rewarding.  Moreover, it is only then that our lives and our worship will please him.

Conclusion:
A Christian lady was once expressing to a friend how impossible she found it to say, “Thy will be done.”  One day she confided in a friend about her consternation.  After she had stated her problem the friend replied.  “Suppose your little boy came to you and said, ‘Mother, I have made up my mind to let you have your way with me.  Whatever you ask of me, I will do it.’  How would you respond?  Would you say, ‘Ah, here’s my chance to make him miserable.  I will take away al his pleasures, and fill his life with ever sort of disagreeable things.  I will compel him to do that which is the most difficult and brutal.’”

The woman responded to her friend, “Of course I wouldn’t.  I would hug my child and cover him with kisses.  I would never tell him to do such things.  I would hasten to fill his life with all that is sweet and best.”

The friend drove home her point by saying, “Are you more tender than God?”

When it comes to worship, we might want to do things our way.  We might not want to possess an attitude of dependence and peace.  We might not want to change the way we dress.  We might not want to submit to the word of God when it spells out our roles.  But we must keep in mind that God’s directives, for our lives, and for his worship, are there because he loves us and cares for us.  He wishes to bring himself glory, and he knows that his ways will fill our lives with sweetness.  The only appropriate response is to obey his directives.